If a deep, controlled bottom end is a priority, a 2.1 system might be a better investment. The manufacturers often use technological tweaks to amplify the bass notes, but these can sound boomy, and distort the overall mix. Without a subwoofer, 2.0 systems have trouble reproducing low frequencies. Good speakers will produce full, detailed audio that sounds as the creator intended it.īe aware, though, that finding strong bass response in this price range can be challenging. Often, speakers will exaggerate one-usually the treble or the bass-at the expense of the others. Listen for a good balance between the high (treble), mid, and low (bass) frequencies. Even if you can parse frequency response numbers, they are often exaggerated. Try not to be seduced by manufacturers’ specs on sound quality.

Sound quality: Ask your ears, not the spec sheet These take up extra space but often produce more balanced sound. Occasionally you can also find a decent 2.1 system-a pair of speakers to handle the higher frequencies and separate subwoofer for the bass-for not much more. These basic 2.0 stereo setups, which are comprised of just a left and right speaker with a single driver (the actual loudspeaker) in each, abound in this price range. That money can buy a much better quality two-speaker system. But even if you were to unearth one for $50 or $60, the quality would almost certainly be just as cheap. Sure, a 5.1 (five speakers, one subwoofer) multi-channel speaker system sounds pretty sexy. How to shop for PC speakers 2.0 speakers vs.

Best mini bluetooth speakers under $50